by
Christina Sarich via Natural Society
Monsanto likes to say that those of us against GMOs don’t use ‘real’
science to support claims that genetically modified crops are unsafe,
but what about dirty money
that infiltrates universities which supposedly do ‘good’ science on GM crops, soil, and the chemicals which are used to grow them?
A recent New York Times
article
exposed some of Monsanto’s infiltration into the world of ‘science,’
but a deeper inquiry into the emails coming forward through this article
and from
U.S. Right to Know public disclosure efforts shows a broader and more troubling picture of influence the agricultural sciences are under.
At just a tip of the glyphosate iceberg there is a professor emeritus at the University of Illinois, Bruce Chassy, who
in an August 29, 2011 email to Eric Sachs of Monsanto. He reportedly
suggests that
the Ag industry trade group CropLife, of which Monsanto and other
biotech companies are members, pay his way to do a speaking engagement
on the other side of the world.
In a separate email, Monsanto’s Sachs also suggests to Chassy that he
participate in an American Medical Association meeting to try to
dissuade the AMA from supporting mandatory labeling of GE foods. This is
just one of the intriguing relationships between scientists and Biotech
that are coming to light.
Then there’s Agrochemical company Dow’s reminder to David Shaw, a Mississippi State University weed scientist, that the company
has been very generous
to the University. Shaw was urged to submit comments to the United
States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to approve Dow’s Enlist
soybeans, and provides three pages of helpful suggestions about topics
and arguments.
The Enlist crops are resistant to glyphosate and 2,4-D herbicides,
and are the industry’s response to the epidemic of glyphosate-resistant
weeds caused by the first generation of glyphosate-resistant crops. Shaw
even drafted his comments and submitted them back to Dow before sending
them forward. Where is the scientific integrity in that?
There are also some emails sent to Professor Mike Owen, a weed
scientist at Iowa State from Monsanto, explaining how Owen can counter
public
concerns over dicamba, another toxic chemical being used to grow GM crops.
There are others to professors at Mississippi State, and who know how
many other emails will surface showing that the biotech industry is
intent on infiltrating the ‘science’ behind GMO support at any cost.
While this is not bullet-proof evidence of collusion between the
industry and academics, it is part of a bigger pattern of exclusion and
intimidation that has been linked to biotech industry influence.
There have been numerous “generous” donations from Monsanto to
universities, such US$1 million from Monsanto to Iowa State University
for the “Monsanto Student Services Wing,” in 2012,
Monsanto Student Travel awards, or US$1 million
for a community center at the University of Missouri in 2012, among many examples of industry funding of academia.
Does any real proof of the
dangers of GMOs get past a wall of scientific and biotech collusion like this one?
Thanks for taking the time to read this article. If you found this information helpful, please share it with your friends and family. Your support in our endeavor of sharing free information would be much appreciated.
Follow us on Facebook to stay updated with what's going Viral in the Alternative News scene.
https://www.facebook.com/ViralAlternativeNews
Christina Sarich is a humanitarian and freelance writer helping you to Wake up Your
Sleepy Little Head, and See the Big Picture. Her blog is Yoga for the
New World. Her latest book is Pharma Sutra: Healing the Body And Mind
Through the Art of Yoga.
